Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Dept. of Homeland Security Labelling Conservatives as Terrorists, joins Missouri and Other State Intel Organizations
Just last week I reported that the Democratic Government of the state of Missouri released an intelligence briefing warning that those bearing conservative bumper stickers, clothing, etc should be considered potential right-wing extremists and terrorists. Now Obama's Department of Homeland Security is joining the chorus...
The DHS released an intelligence briefing warning that conservatives - that is, those opposing Obama's ultra-Liberal agenda - should be considered potential terrorists. This on the eve of the Tea Party Protests, clearly meant as a show of force by the Obama administration to Conservatives that noncompliance will not be tolerated - the first step toward totalitarianism...
The briefing can be read here
Specific areas I would like to highlight -
1. Regarding Lone Wolfs, as reported on Monday in my question into the Fiber Optics cut -
2. Those who have legally purchased weapons in the wake of the election have now been targeted as right wing extremists -
3. Special warnings have been set for "Disgruntled Military Veterans" of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars -
The report summarizes that those concerned with the following are potential terrorists:
1. concern over planned bans on guns, forced gun registration, and shortage of ammunition
2. concern over loss of US manufacturing ability to foreign countries
3. concern over UN involvement in US affairs, such as the new "Child Care" world treaty that Obama is signing the US into, and a broad move toward a One World Government
4. concern over lack of government action regarding illegal immigration
5. concern over economic downturn related to civil unrest and protests against the govt (Tea parties)
6. Christians who believe in "end times" prophecies
7. concern over same-sex marriage, abortion, and other leftist social agenda items
In short, just as the MIAC reported that conservative values were being deemed potential terrorist ideology, now so is the Department of Homeland Security echoing that call.
There is further discussion that Conservative Talk Radio is acting as the mouthpiece against the government, and is merely fanning the flames of dissent, leading to radical extremism - also known as conservatism...
Folks - the ideals of the Republican Platform, the basis for conservatism, and the fundamentals of libertarian free markets have officially been identified by the Obama Administration as threats to his new government - his new country.
I never would have thought that in America one who truly believes and defends the ideals on which this country were founded would be labelled as extreme.
So there you have it. As you join the tea parties today, know that the government is watching you - labelling you as a threat to American Security - and will treat you like the extremist terrorist that you are.
Give 'em hell, then, I suppose!
The DHS released an intelligence briefing warning that conservatives - that is, those opposing Obama's ultra-Liberal agenda - should be considered potential terrorists. This on the eve of the Tea Party Protests, clearly meant as a show of force by the Obama administration to Conservatives that noncompliance will not be tolerated - the first step toward totalitarianism...
The briefing can be read here
Specific areas I would like to highlight -
1. Regarding Lone Wolfs, as reported on Monday in my question into the Fiber Optics cut -
"The possible passage of new restrictions on firearms and the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks."
2. Those who have legally purchased weapons in the wake of the election have now been targeted as right wing extremists -
"Proposed imposition of firearms restrictions and weapons bans likely would
attract new members into the ranks of right wing extremist groups, as well as
potentially spur some of them to begin planning and training for violence
against the government. The high volume of purchases and stockpiling of weapons and ammunition by right wing extremists in anticipation of restrictions and bans in some parts of the country continue to be a primary concern to law
enforcement."
3. Special warnings have been set for "Disgruntled Military Veterans" of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars -
"DHS/I&A assesses that right wing extremists will attempt to recruit and radicalize returning veterans in order to exploit their skills and knowledge derived from military training and combat. These skills and knowledge have the potential to boost the capabilities of extremists—including lone wolves or small terrorist cells—to carry out violence. The willingness of a small percentage of military personnel to join extremist groups during the 1990s because they were disgruntled, disillusioned, or suffering from the psychological effects of war is being replicated today."
The report summarizes that those concerned with the following are potential terrorists:
1. concern over planned bans on guns, forced gun registration, and shortage of ammunition
2. concern over loss of US manufacturing ability to foreign countries
3. concern over UN involvement in US affairs, such as the new "Child Care" world treaty that Obama is signing the US into, and a broad move toward a One World Government
4. concern over lack of government action regarding illegal immigration
5. concern over economic downturn related to civil unrest and protests against the govt (Tea parties)
6. Christians who believe in "end times" prophecies
7. concern over same-sex marriage, abortion, and other leftist social agenda items
In short, just as the MIAC reported that conservative values were being deemed potential terrorist ideology, now so is the Department of Homeland Security echoing that call.
There is further discussion that Conservative Talk Radio is acting as the mouthpiece against the government, and is merely fanning the flames of dissent, leading to radical extremism - also known as conservatism...
Folks - the ideals of the Republican Platform, the basis for conservatism, and the fundamentals of libertarian free markets have officially been identified by the Obama Administration as threats to his new government - his new country.
I never would have thought that in America one who truly believes and defends the ideals on which this country were founded would be labelled as extreme.
So there you have it. As you join the tea parties today, know that the government is watching you - labelling you as a threat to American Security - and will treat you like the extremist terrorist that you are.
Give 'em hell, then, I suppose!
LIVE BLOGGING FROM DENVER TEA PARTY
I plan to mobile blog from the Denver tea party today. Stay posted for any developing news. The reports will be short tweets posted directly to the blog, as developments occur.
My theme for protest will be:
Don't Tread On Me - Stop the Growth of Government, Stop Asset Seizures and Spending
I hope you can all make it down to one of the local rallies!
My theme for protest will be:
Don't Tread On Me - Stop the Growth of Government, Stop Asset Seizures and Spending
I hope you can all make it down to one of the local rallies!
Monday, April 13, 2009
Isolated Incident or "Terror" Probe? Fiber Optics Lines Cut in San Jose
In the information technology capitol of the Untied States, Silicon Valley, ten fiber optics cables were cut in four locations on April 9th - effectively eliminating the ability for phones or Internet connectivity to hundreds of thousands of area residents, as well as hi-tech corporations. This was an act of sabotage, either by one or many individuals, which was well coordinated and precisely executed.
The question is, then, was this a mere isolated act of vandalism, or was this a probe measuring the response and impact of an attack on the cyber-infrastructure?
I have often speculated that the beginning phase of an attack would commence with an attack on communication lines... effectively eliminating the ability of individuals to receive information or share information with authorities. Was someone watching the impact of these line cuts to determine emergency service impact?
AT&T has offered a $250,000 bounty for information leading to the conviction of the culprits of this attack - much more than the usual $15,000 for infrastructure vandalism... indicating that this attack was something more.
If nothing else, it clearly highlighted the complete absence of security of the fiber optics network - as these culprits merely lowered themselves into a number of manholes and attacked the lines. There are no sensors, no alarms, nothing - other than intersection cameras...
In an age when even televisions will not be able to broadcast the emergency broadcast over the analog airwaves after June 15th, such reliance on a network of unsecured infrastructure is beyond troubling.
If you can effectively eliminate the transfer of information within a community while striking fear - such as some highly visible attack right before or right after, you can create chaos on a disastrous scale... Whether this was an intended "terror" probe or some isolated act of sabotage, it works in conjunction with other probes measuring how high of an effect there was on the community and how well the response was prepared and coordinated.
Ultimately, this type of attack underlines the most dangerous element - the "lone wolf"... the lack of leadership and the lack of ability for cells to organize and be infiltrated in this country have given rise, from time to time, to the most dangerous type of extremist - rogues. Home Grown extremism, in the last 20-30 years, has largely come from rogues... Ted Kaczynski, Timothy McVeigh, Clayton Waagner, Eric Rudolph, Jeffrey Dahmer, just to name a few...
I echo my concern - reliance on these services for survival is personal destruction. Every responsible individual should have the ability to communicate - even by Citizen Band radio, which has an emergency channel. You should be able to field dress wounds, provide some sort of immediate triage type care, feed and hydrate yourself for a number of days, and posses certain amount of survival information and self defense ability. The first line of defense is the self... If you are actively prepared, such attacks may impact the community, but your survival is first and foremost.
Be it an act of vandalism, or the warning signs for an upcoming attack, the message is clear - we live in a time of increased unrest, of the individual mind, of the community, and of the world...
The question is, then, was this a mere isolated act of vandalism, or was this a probe measuring the response and impact of an attack on the cyber-infrastructure?
I have often speculated that the beginning phase of an attack would commence with an attack on communication lines... effectively eliminating the ability of individuals to receive information or share information with authorities. Was someone watching the impact of these line cuts to determine emergency service impact?
AT&T has offered a $250,000 bounty for information leading to the conviction of the culprits of this attack - much more than the usual $15,000 for infrastructure vandalism... indicating that this attack was something more.
If nothing else, it clearly highlighted the complete absence of security of the fiber optics network - as these culprits merely lowered themselves into a number of manholes and attacked the lines. There are no sensors, no alarms, nothing - other than intersection cameras...
In an age when even televisions will not be able to broadcast the emergency broadcast over the analog airwaves after June 15th, such reliance on a network of unsecured infrastructure is beyond troubling.
If you can effectively eliminate the transfer of information within a community while striking fear - such as some highly visible attack right before or right after, you can create chaos on a disastrous scale... Whether this was an intended "terror" probe or some isolated act of sabotage, it works in conjunction with other probes measuring how high of an effect there was on the community and how well the response was prepared and coordinated.
Ultimately, this type of attack underlines the most dangerous element - the "lone wolf"... the lack of leadership and the lack of ability for cells to organize and be infiltrated in this country have given rise, from time to time, to the most dangerous type of extremist - rogues. Home Grown extremism, in the last 20-30 years, has largely come from rogues... Ted Kaczynski, Timothy McVeigh, Clayton Waagner, Eric Rudolph, Jeffrey Dahmer, just to name a few...
I echo my concern - reliance on these services for survival is personal destruction. Every responsible individual should have the ability to communicate - even by Citizen Band radio, which has an emergency channel. You should be able to field dress wounds, provide some sort of immediate triage type care, feed and hydrate yourself for a number of days, and posses certain amount of survival information and self defense ability. The first line of defense is the self... If you are actively prepared, such attacks may impact the community, but your survival is first and foremost.
Be it an act of vandalism, or the warning signs for an upcoming attack, the message is clear - we live in a time of increased unrest, of the individual mind, of the community, and of the world...
Friday, April 10, 2009
Being an Indian in America: the Shonto Pete Story
There is no doubt a certain level of prejudice in every one of us. It is nothing to be ashamed of - it is a byproduct of the environment in which we were raised. It only becomes problematic when these prejudices overshadow our own reason and inhibit our ability to interact... be it with individuals of other sexes, ethnicities, cultures, or even regions. So, what happens when these prejudices turn to hatred?
Famous cases of such revealed prejudices are Gibson's anti-Semitic drunken rant, Michael Richards' rant in the comedy night club, and most famously but never talked about, the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
The BIA is the last official legal form of subjugation based strictly on ethnicity - aimed at perpetually impeding Indian Tribes' ability to overcome impoverishment. It is, in a way, the government's own condoning of state sponsored racism - not to mention the protectorate of the modern day concentration camps, called reservations.
In many of my previous postings on this topic, I have discussed these governmental problems surrounding the BIA - and in the case of Mary Ramos and her son, I have delved into the subject of Indian Child Welfare Act... Today, i would like to discus Shonto Pete, an Indian shot in the head (who has survived) by a drunk off-duty police officer who pursued out of hatred, with continuous threats that he intended to kill.
The police officer claimed that he was trying to stop Shonto, who he had claimed attempted to steal his truck. Shonto was found not guilty of the alleged attempted auto theft.
The police officer was put on administrative leave for two years, regardless of drunk driving and carrying and discharging a weapon while intoxicated. These are two clear violations which should have cost the officer his badge. This comes after a jury acquited the officer, Jay Olsen, of first degree assault and reckless endangerment (for drunkenly discharging his firearm in a housing community):
There may be a civil case pending, for damages resulting from the shooting.
However, there is an underlying question regarding the system, the officer, and the perception of Indians in America.
In discussing Indian Affairs with a former high ranking member of the GOP, there was an underlying tone of prejudice against "reservation culture" - the belief that a Reservation Indian is somehow especially despicable, and labelled as drunk, violent or otherwise unstable. This is a perception perpetuated by the BIA, and their destructive policy of "ruling the reservations."
Would Shonto have been pursued or shot at if he were not Indian? Would the officer have been acquitted if Shonto were not Indian? Is there less justice in our society for individuals who adhere to their Indian Ancestry or who "appear as Indian" in our society? Is it an unspoken crime in our United States to be Indian?
So long as the United States Government holds lands in trust, by force, blocking the self government and community building needed for their societies to once again thrive, the Indian Peoples of this land will continue to be the target of prejudice, the victims of poverty, and perpetually derided in our society as a mythical creature of the old west.
I have posed this question once before, and I do so again... what is your own perception of Indians... when you imagine an Indian, do you feel disgust for the poverty stricken reservation Indian, do you feel curiosity for such a forgotten culture, do you feel empathy as an ancestor of a subjugated people, or do you look at the situation with apathy?
The worst crime against humanity has happened, and is happening within our own society... but for some reason we have accepted it as status quo.
What does it mean to be Indian in America?
Famous cases of such revealed prejudices are Gibson's anti-Semitic drunken rant, Michael Richards' rant in the comedy night club, and most famously but never talked about, the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
The BIA is the last official legal form of subjugation based strictly on ethnicity - aimed at perpetually impeding Indian Tribes' ability to overcome impoverishment. It is, in a way, the government's own condoning of state sponsored racism - not to mention the protectorate of the modern day concentration camps, called reservations.
In many of my previous postings on this topic, I have discussed these governmental problems surrounding the BIA - and in the case of Mary Ramos and her son, I have delved into the subject of Indian Child Welfare Act... Today, i would like to discus Shonto Pete, an Indian shot in the head (who has survived) by a drunk off-duty police officer who pursued out of hatred, with continuous threats that he intended to kill.
The police officer claimed that he was trying to stop Shonto, who he had claimed attempted to steal his truck. Shonto was found not guilty of the alleged attempted auto theft.
The police officer was put on administrative leave for two years, regardless of drunk driving and carrying and discharging a weapon while intoxicated. These are two clear violations which should have cost the officer his badge. This comes after a jury acquited the officer, Jay Olsen, of first degree assault and reckless endangerment (for drunkenly discharging his firearm in a housing community):
Olsen refused to talk to journalists assembled in the courthouse hallway, staying in the courtroom and deferring to his attorney, Rob Cossey.
“This trial was very intense. If (Olsen) had been convicted, he’d be facing a lot of
years in prison,” Cossey said. Asked if Olsen would likely be returning to his job as a swing-shift patrol officer in the Spokane Police Department, Cossey said he doubts it.
“He committed significant violations of department policy. I don’t think he’s getting his job back,” Cossey said. Those violations included getting drunk while off-duty in a local bar with a concealed weapon strapped to his waist, and chasing Pete but not calling 911 or police dispatch during the confrontation.
There may be a civil case pending, for damages resulting from the shooting.
However, there is an underlying question regarding the system, the officer, and the perception of Indians in America.
In discussing Indian Affairs with a former high ranking member of the GOP, there was an underlying tone of prejudice against "reservation culture" - the belief that a Reservation Indian is somehow especially despicable, and labelled as drunk, violent or otherwise unstable. This is a perception perpetuated by the BIA, and their destructive policy of "ruling the reservations."
Would Shonto have been pursued or shot at if he were not Indian? Would the officer have been acquitted if Shonto were not Indian? Is there less justice in our society for individuals who adhere to their Indian Ancestry or who "appear as Indian" in our society? Is it an unspoken crime in our United States to be Indian?
So long as the United States Government holds lands in trust, by force, blocking the self government and community building needed for their societies to once again thrive, the Indian Peoples of this land will continue to be the target of prejudice, the victims of poverty, and perpetually derided in our society as a mythical creature of the old west.
I have posed this question once before, and I do so again... what is your own perception of Indians... when you imagine an Indian, do you feel disgust for the poverty stricken reservation Indian, do you feel curiosity for such a forgotten culture, do you feel empathy as an ancestor of a subjugated people, or do you look at the situation with apathy?
The worst crime against humanity has happened, and is happening within our own society... but for some reason we have accepted it as status quo.
What does it mean to be Indian in America?
Alternative Currency - Local Communities Rightly Shun Fed, IRS
This story has been reported a few times over the last year - so I will take this opportunity, ahead of the TAX DAY TEA PARTY, to address it: Local Currency.
Let us suppose a hypothetical situation for a moment. You have $10, backed and taxed by the Federal Government... you use that $10 to buy a lamp. Now you, and every one of your neighbors has a lamp... now suppose that your neighbor had an extra desk and in bartering with him, you agreed to trade your new lamp for his extra desk. It is a legal exchange of goods and services - there was a buyer, a seller, a product, etc... but no taxes... there was perceived earning by both parties - but at what value? Or should I say, what legal taxable value???
Now, let us move this hypothetical into a real life situation - Local Currency. More specifically, let us use the "Berkshare", printed and circulated as a local currency in Great Barrington Massachusetts. This product costs $0.95 for one note of Berkshare. It is not a federally backed currency, and thus not a federally recognized legal tender. It is therefore a "good"... or a product. If a business, be it a neighbor, a diner, or a furniture store chooses to accept this product in exchange for another product - what is the tax value of a fair trade on barter of goods?
Amy Kirshner, in discussing the "Liberty Dollar" writes:
So I ask again - what is the legal value of a lamp. Isn't the idea of money a perceived medium used to standardize "value"? So should I submit my taxes to the IRS in the measure of lamps? What if I don't report the transaction - am I legally mandated to report all such transactions or "earnings" - like when a buddy tosses me a beer before the game, is that a tax write-off for charity on his part, and do I need to report an exchange of goods or value income on my part?
And if a community chooses to opt-out of the federal reserve system, how can there be a legal measure of value within the community's new currency?
The idea of community currency is to establish wealth within a community - it limits trade and goods exchange from other communities, but supports local trade and commerce. Taxes remove the wealth from this community - for the sake of benefiting the community??? That does not make sense.
Suppose, for an instance, the situation in Hawaii, where private citizens of a community went around the bureaucratic roadblocks of state and federal government, and fixed their own washed out road and bridge. This took place in Hawaii, where private citizens feared for their livelihood if the repairs were not completed before tourist season. What the government had planned for a two year "near term" project - slated to cost over $4 million dollars, the private citizens completed in 8 days at a cost of FREE. The story is here.
These citizens of this Hawaiian community kept value in their community, rejecting government intervention, and rejecting the notion that the greater value of the "state" community was being served by higher priorities... Community does not work efficiently at the Macro Level!
If citizens begin to realize that they are responsible for the best interest of their community, and that it is more important to retain wealth locally to support their own infrastructure, and they begin to understand that they can achieve better results more efficiently outside of government bureaucracies - then doesn't this pose a grave threat to the massive government requiring taxes and subjugation to survive? Don't these individuals pose a threat to the infrastructure established to ensure equal wealth and equal outcome, as the Obama administration and liberals are attempting to establish.
Isn't the idea of localism and statism dangerous?
It seems to me that a community that takes ownership of itself is more likely to upkeep, as wealth will not come from outside, but from within - so it is in their best interest to enhance their own infrastructure - not by government contracts - but on the blood, sweat, and tears of their own labor - their own back breaking work - which is the ownership of something local. The same thing is said for private property ownership - when you invest in something, it is in your best interest to enhance it, not destroy it... else you are destroying your own wealth.
As the federal government is pushing for less personal ownership and more collective ownership, one has to wonder the logic behind their reasoning.
Local ownership and personal property ownership are the foundation for wealth, personally and locally.
Consider, as a commenter posted in my previous post, ways to invest locally, enhance your wealth off the radar of the mainstream (which ultimately would be used as Obama to say "I told you so" - completely discounting your hard work as his success), and do your best to support local currency or barter.
Let us suppose a hypothetical situation for a moment. You have $10, backed and taxed by the Federal Government... you use that $10 to buy a lamp. Now you, and every one of your neighbors has a lamp... now suppose that your neighbor had an extra desk and in bartering with him, you agreed to trade your new lamp for his extra desk. It is a legal exchange of goods and services - there was a buyer, a seller, a product, etc... but no taxes... there was perceived earning by both parties - but at what value? Or should I say, what legal taxable value???
Now, let us move this hypothetical into a real life situation - Local Currency. More specifically, let us use the "Berkshare", printed and circulated as a local currency in Great Barrington Massachusetts. This product costs $0.95 for one note of Berkshare. It is not a federally backed currency, and thus not a federally recognized legal tender. It is therefore a "good"... or a product. If a business, be it a neighbor, a diner, or a furniture store chooses to accept this product in exchange for another product - what is the tax value of a fair trade on barter of goods?
Amy Kirshner, in discussing the "Liberty Dollar" writes:
Report your earnings on your taxes and pay your taxes - it’s the law. If you
have issues with the IRS and taxes, there are other movements and organizations
that address that. Don’t use local currency for that reason.
So I ask again - what is the legal value of a lamp. Isn't the idea of money a perceived medium used to standardize "value"? So should I submit my taxes to the IRS in the measure of lamps? What if I don't report the transaction - am I legally mandated to report all such transactions or "earnings" - like when a buddy tosses me a beer before the game, is that a tax write-off for charity on his part, and do I need to report an exchange of goods or value income on my part?
And if a community chooses to opt-out of the federal reserve system, how can there be a legal measure of value within the community's new currency?
The idea of community currency is to establish wealth within a community - it limits trade and goods exchange from other communities, but supports local trade and commerce. Taxes remove the wealth from this community - for the sake of benefiting the community??? That does not make sense.
Suppose, for an instance, the situation in Hawaii, where private citizens of a community went around the bureaucratic roadblocks of state and federal government, and fixed their own washed out road and bridge. This took place in Hawaii, where private citizens feared for their livelihood if the repairs were not completed before tourist season. What the government had planned for a two year "near term" project - slated to cost over $4 million dollars, the private citizens completed in 8 days at a cost of FREE. The story is here.
These citizens of this Hawaiian community kept value in their community, rejecting government intervention, and rejecting the notion that the greater value of the "state" community was being served by higher priorities... Community does not work efficiently at the Macro Level!
If citizens begin to realize that they are responsible for the best interest of their community, and that it is more important to retain wealth locally to support their own infrastructure, and they begin to understand that they can achieve better results more efficiently outside of government bureaucracies - then doesn't this pose a grave threat to the massive government requiring taxes and subjugation to survive? Don't these individuals pose a threat to the infrastructure established to ensure equal wealth and equal outcome, as the Obama administration and liberals are attempting to establish.
Isn't the idea of localism and statism dangerous?
It seems to me that a community that takes ownership of itself is more likely to upkeep, as wealth will not come from outside, but from within - so it is in their best interest to enhance their own infrastructure - not by government contracts - but on the blood, sweat, and tears of their own labor - their own back breaking work - which is the ownership of something local. The same thing is said for private property ownership - when you invest in something, it is in your best interest to enhance it, not destroy it... else you are destroying your own wealth.
As the federal government is pushing for less personal ownership and more collective ownership, one has to wonder the logic behind their reasoning.
Local ownership and personal property ownership are the foundation for wealth, personally and locally.
Consider, as a commenter posted in my previous post, ways to invest locally, enhance your wealth off the radar of the mainstream (which ultimately would be used as Obama to say "I told you so" - completely discounting your hard work as his success), and do your best to support local currency or barter.
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
The Tea Parties - So Long As We Are Free
On November 4th, 2008, the United States was drastically changed - the most liberal leftist President in the history of the US had been elected - running on a platform of wealth redistribution and a slew of other socialist ideals. Since November 5th the left has been joining in chorus, relishing in song that "capitalism is dead." If Capitalism is dead, then the fundamentals of liberty have died with it - including personal property and personal responsibility.
The common theme of the Tea Parties is "Silent Majority No Longer" - indicating that the ideal of liberty, personal property protection, etc, is not a minority ideology, it is one shared by a majority of Americans - and that we are not going to sit idly by and allow the erosion of such liberties.
Participation in these events is nothing less than a show of force by usually calm and collected conservatives, indicating the extreme polarity being caused by the Obama administration and his extremely left leaning congress. Where we have been quietly disgruntled, breaking our backs at work instead of protesting every government event, the left have put into place an infrastructure to legally steal our hard earned personal property, our paychecks, the value we have placed on our lives and the work we have chosen to accomplish. The fruits of our labor are being harvested by the left in order to "spread the wealth" to those who choose not to work, or have chosen such an alternative lifestyle that they are unable to provide for their family in the way that you have done - though they expect that with their lesser amount of work that they deserve what you have worked so hard for.
These Tea Parties are protests against the reaping of our personal property. They are protests against entitlement mentality being supported by the government. They are protests in support of fundamental freedoms.
I ask that you give up half of a day of work - half a days paycheck - a few hours of your time in order to secure your rights as a free citizen of these United States... help like-minded individuals stand up and shout at the top of your lungs that Liberty is not Dead, so long as there is breath in these free lungs!
The common theme of the Tea Parties is "Silent Majority No Longer" - indicating that the ideal of liberty, personal property protection, etc, is not a minority ideology, it is one shared by a majority of Americans - and that we are not going to sit idly by and allow the erosion of such liberties.
Participation in these events is nothing less than a show of force by usually calm and collected conservatives, indicating the extreme polarity being caused by the Obama administration and his extremely left leaning congress. Where we have been quietly disgruntled, breaking our backs at work instead of protesting every government event, the left have put into place an infrastructure to legally steal our hard earned personal property, our paychecks, the value we have placed on our lives and the work we have chosen to accomplish. The fruits of our labor are being harvested by the left in order to "spread the wealth" to those who choose not to work, or have chosen such an alternative lifestyle that they are unable to provide for their family in the way that you have done - though they expect that with their lesser amount of work that they deserve what you have worked so hard for.
These Tea Parties are protests against the reaping of our personal property. They are protests against entitlement mentality being supported by the government. They are protests in support of fundamental freedoms.
I ask that you give up half of a day of work - half a days paycheck - a few hours of your time in order to secure your rights as a free citizen of these United States... help like-minded individuals stand up and shout at the top of your lungs that Liberty is not Dead, so long as there is breath in these free lungs!
Monday, April 6, 2009
Why American Sovereignty is Dying
There was a time when the concept of a New World Order was the whisper between conspiracy theorists - but now it is a mainstream idea, being sold as the way to revolutionize the world economy...
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown stated at the G-20 Summit in London: "I think a New World Order IS emerging, and with it the foundations of a new and progressive era of international cooperation"
The New World Order has always been feared as a conspiracy by the ruling elite to subjugate the "working class" of the world - creating a one world government aimed at total control of the subjects of the planet.
To mention fears or concerns about a suspected NWO would put you in a category of crazy, removing all legitimacy of current, past, or future arguments.
So... what if your fears were correct? As indicated by PM Brown in the video segment above, the NWO is upon us, aimed at erasing the lines that define our cultures and replacing them with a world standard - for better or worse, we are all recipients of the same government rule.
America's independence and founding was a radical concept, breaking with the idea of theocratic rule or government rule, and instilling the concept of individual liberty and all the responsibilities which are encompassed by these freedoms. The sovereignty of America was key to the survival of these ideas - that personal liberty, personal freedoms, trump government control in ALL aspects of our lives... The seclusion of America reinforced the idea that we could survive on our own - and we did for so many years... whether or not you ultimately agree with all the decisions in the history of the United States, it has largely been a driving force for freedom and liberty - at least at her core.
Which leads to the concept of a New World Government - an opportunity to trump the consumers of the United States - eliminating once and for all any legal blocks put in place by the "outdated" constitution - the very contract and fabric of our society...
The loss of American Sovereignty means the loss of freedoms - the loss of personal responsibility - and the end to obstruction from the implementation of Government Ideals. Resistance to being ruled - it is based in the founding documents - and the belief that these documents are absolute must be destroyed in order for true dominance to evolve... only it is not progressive - it is not evolving - it is devolving, from free peoples back to tyrannical single source control - this time the entire world is losing.
It is, unfortunately, the Americans who have the most to lose. The nation that invented true liberty, as eroded as it is today, is still the last best hope on the face of the earth... the undermining of American Liberty is the single greatest crime in the history of man...
British Prime Minister Gordon Brown stated at the G-20 Summit in London: "I think a New World Order IS emerging, and with it the foundations of a new and progressive era of international cooperation"
The New World Order has always been feared as a conspiracy by the ruling elite to subjugate the "working class" of the world - creating a one world government aimed at total control of the subjects of the planet.
To mention fears or concerns about a suspected NWO would put you in a category of crazy, removing all legitimacy of current, past, or future arguments.
So... what if your fears were correct? As indicated by PM Brown in the video segment above, the NWO is upon us, aimed at erasing the lines that define our cultures and replacing them with a world standard - for better or worse, we are all recipients of the same government rule.
America's independence and founding was a radical concept, breaking with the idea of theocratic rule or government rule, and instilling the concept of individual liberty and all the responsibilities which are encompassed by these freedoms. The sovereignty of America was key to the survival of these ideas - that personal liberty, personal freedoms, trump government control in ALL aspects of our lives... The seclusion of America reinforced the idea that we could survive on our own - and we did for so many years... whether or not you ultimately agree with all the decisions in the history of the United States, it has largely been a driving force for freedom and liberty - at least at her core.
Which leads to the concept of a New World Government - an opportunity to trump the consumers of the United States - eliminating once and for all any legal blocks put in place by the "outdated" constitution - the very contract and fabric of our society...
- It has been the constitution which has protected the right and freedom to openly protest our government.
- It has been our constitution which has protected our right and freedom to openly worship or to abstain from worship without fear of persecution.
- It has been our constitution which has protected our right and freedom to a fair and speedy trial, protection against unnecessary search and seizure of our person or property.
- It has been our constitution which has protected our right and freedom to defend ourselves from encroachments on these rights and freedoms, by promising to never infringe on our rights to openly keep and bear arms.
A New World Order will begin by the series of alliances in the name of "International Cooperation". It will then lead to the creation of the proposed International Currency - eliminating all independent funding of governments. It will end in a Constitution or Rules of Engagement of it's own - a global opportunity to re-write the operations and protected freedoms from an international government... unchecked, unelected, unstoppable.
The death of American Sovereignty is no accident. It is a calculated effort by a group of conspirators to effectively overthrow ALL world governments, in the name of international peace and cooperation. The same loss of sovereignty was tested by the formation of the European Union, and is being expanded globally - all those who oppose will be taken by force - however that force may be applied.The loss of American Sovereignty means the loss of freedoms - the loss of personal responsibility - and the end to obstruction from the implementation of Government Ideals. Resistance to being ruled - it is based in the founding documents - and the belief that these documents are absolute must be destroyed in order for true dominance to evolve... only it is not progressive - it is not evolving - it is devolving, from free peoples back to tyrannical single source control - this time the entire world is losing.
It is, unfortunately, the Americans who have the most to lose. The nation that invented true liberty, as eroded as it is today, is still the last best hope on the face of the earth... the undermining of American Liberty is the single greatest crime in the history of man...
Thursday, April 2, 2009
Conservatives are a "Terrorist Militia" - so says MIAC
It is a well known Socialist strategy - destroy all opposition. Fellow freedom loving conservatives, be warned - THE WAR AGAINST LIBERTY IS GEARING UP.
I have often warned of the implications of the path these United States were wrongfully taking - and it has just been discovered by me that these warnings - the words that you are reading today - come from what the Obama Team are now considering "a potential paramilitary terrorist".
I warn you that continuing to read this blog, or continuing to think or believe the same way that I do will also lead to you being labelled as a potential increased security threat to the nation, and possibly a POTENTIAL TERRORIST.
The Missouri Information Analysis Center (a division of the Missouri State Police) has released a report called the MODERN MILITIA MOVEMENT warning officers to be extra diligent in watching out for signs of these potential terrorist group members (identified as Right-Wing Extremists), including:
Here is a segment of Rush Limbaugh discussing the story:
With the increase in frustration over how the Federal Government is being run, and the increase in anti-government demonstrations such as the Tea Parties, it should be noted that at least in one of the 50 states - and likely in others - Conservatives and Libertarian minded individuals attending these rallies are potentially being marked as "Suspect Terrorists".
The Tea Parties themselves, which are coming up on April 15th, is an anti-Socialist / anti-taxation rally openly criticising the expansion of the federal government, and therefore in the eyes of the Missouri State Police (and potentially national agencies) a rally being held by anti-government militias and terrorists.
Readers - we are now living in an age where political dissent is classified as terrorism, terror rallies, or in support of terrorist activities... The use of the word terrorist instills fear, instantly, and the broadening of the word terrorist to include anyone openly dissenting with governmental leadership is little more than a tactic of annihilating opposition.
Let it be known to all that I am anti-federal government when the government does not uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States... when it is led in a manner that is tyrannical, and undermines the fundamental liberties defined in the Declaration of Independence.
Let it be known that I will gladly call myself extreme, if being extreme means rejecting a Socialist agenda aimed at the dissolution of individual liberties and general free market capitalism.
Let it be known that I will gladly stand up and declare a need for revolution when Liberty is given a death sentence.
I will not stop speaking these truths - even if it means that I will be considered a danger to national security by the metrics used in Missouri - who consider my beliefs as being potentially terroristic.
I am an honest man, an active Republican, a vocal supporter of Liberty, a supporter of State's Rights, in favor of abolishing the IRS and replacing it with a flat or fair tax system, in favor of securing the borders from illegal immigration, an advocate for Gun Rights, an advocate for personal responsibility, and a flier of the Gadsden Flag.
If being a conservative/libertarian Republican identifies me as a potential terrorist, then I gladly join the ranks of Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, Paine, Henry, and other founders of this nation who so nobly defied tyranny once before.
To support a union for the sake of a union is idiocracy. To support a union founded on the principles that liberty is the justest of all causes - well, I say, Give me Liberty or Give Me Death.
I have often warned of the implications of the path these United States were wrongfully taking - and it has just been discovered by me that these warnings - the words that you are reading today - come from what the Obama Team are now considering "a potential paramilitary terrorist".
I warn you that continuing to read this blog, or continuing to think or believe the same way that I do will also lead to you being labelled as a potential increased security threat to the nation, and possibly a POTENTIAL TERRORIST.
The Missouri Information Analysis Center (a division of the Missouri State Police) has released a report called the MODERN MILITIA MOVEMENT warning officers to be extra diligent in watching out for signs of these potential terrorist group members (identified as Right-Wing Extremists), including:
- Christians
- States Rights advocates
- Right to Life Advocates
- Anti-Illegal Immigration Advocates
- Paintballers or Military Simulation Enthusiasts
- BLOGGERS, Chat-Forum users, Social Networks involving Conservative Issues
- County Sheriff Citizen task Forces (citizen assistants - aka Volunteer Sheriff's Deputies)
- Members of Third Party Political Groups (Such as Libertarian, Constitution, Independence, Campaign for Liberty, etc) - specifically supporters of Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, and Bob Barr
- Those who have bumper stickers in support of Ron Paul, in support of "Right to Carry" arms, anti-illegal immigration, in support of tax-code revision, and other such 'RADICAL RIGHT' values
- Those who oppose the North American Union
- Those who oppose the Federal Reserve Bank, or World bank
- Those who strongly advocate for the 2nd Amendment
- Those who display Gadsden Flags, Common Law US Flags, or US Flags in Distress (upside down or backwards)
- Those who display or recite MOLON LABE, which is a Greek Phrase for "come and take them" sometimes translated to "Over my dead body" - or "From my Cold Dead Hands" - also known as the battle cry of the NRA
Here is a segment of Rush Limbaugh discussing the story:
With the increase in frustration over how the Federal Government is being run, and the increase in anti-government demonstrations such as the Tea Parties, it should be noted that at least in one of the 50 states - and likely in others - Conservatives and Libertarian minded individuals attending these rallies are potentially being marked as "Suspect Terrorists".
The Tea Parties themselves, which are coming up on April 15th, is an anti-Socialist / anti-taxation rally openly criticising the expansion of the federal government, and therefore in the eyes of the Missouri State Police (and potentially national agencies) a rally being held by anti-government militias and terrorists.
Readers - we are now living in an age where political dissent is classified as terrorism, terror rallies, or in support of terrorist activities... The use of the word terrorist instills fear, instantly, and the broadening of the word terrorist to include anyone openly dissenting with governmental leadership is little more than a tactic of annihilating opposition.
Let it be known to all that I am anti-federal government when the government does not uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States... when it is led in a manner that is tyrannical, and undermines the fundamental liberties defined in the Declaration of Independence.
Let it be known that I will gladly call myself extreme, if being extreme means rejecting a Socialist agenda aimed at the dissolution of individual liberties and general free market capitalism.
Let it be known that I will gladly stand up and declare a need for revolution when Liberty is given a death sentence.
I will not stop speaking these truths - even if it means that I will be considered a danger to national security by the metrics used in Missouri - who consider my beliefs as being potentially terroristic.
I am an honest man, an active Republican, a vocal supporter of Liberty, a supporter of State's Rights, in favor of abolishing the IRS and replacing it with a flat or fair tax system, in favor of securing the borders from illegal immigration, an advocate for Gun Rights, an advocate for personal responsibility, and a flier of the Gadsden Flag.
If being a conservative/libertarian Republican identifies me as a potential terrorist, then I gladly join the ranks of Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, Paine, Henry, and other founders of this nation who so nobly defied tyranny once before.
To support a union for the sake of a union is idiocracy. To support a union founded on the principles that liberty is the justest of all causes - well, I say, Give me Liberty or Give Me Death.
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Live Free or Die
The last two weeks have kept me at arms length from blogging, and busy enough to have little interaction with news and/or e-mail.
This has been both a blessing and a curse...
A blessing, because I have had an opportunity to step back and watch the events of the world unravel from a 30,000 foot level - giving me a different perspective for a short time while out of the trenches. It allowed me the opportunity to attempt to piece together our situation and to reflect on what it all means.
Which leads me to the curse - mainly because of the horrors I saw while viewing the entire spectacle, and my inability to jump back into the trenches and drive action - which is in my nature to do.
Right now, things are happening at lightning speed - and by things, I mean the status quo is dying and with it liberty, autonomy, and general welfare of the people.
Some issues that were of noted interest while I was away include Obama and the UN searching for common ground on a "World Currency", removing the last vested definition of borders or culture making up a country. Along these lines, Obama is directly dissolving the United States in favor of a One World Government - free from accountability - absolute tyranny.
Along these same lines, the government is increasing their choke-hold over companies - directing laws at individuals, mandating business decisions of recently nationalized companies, and using the national economic crisis to change laws in order to accomplish "legal" power grabs.
The end game is simple - absolute power - absolute tyranny - Pax Unitis... a world United in "Peace"... complete capitulation by those with liberty in order to join those without, in the name of security, stabilization, and peace...
What it amounts to is little more than the final solution of the New World Order... think I am kidding, or just a conspiracy theorist?
World Bank president Robert Zoellick, during a speech on the eve of the G-20 London summit stated, “If leaders are serious about creating new global responsibilities or governance, let them start by modernising multilateralism to empower the WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank Group to monitor national policies.”
Sic Semper Tyrannis, thus always to tyrants, the motto of the state of Virginia, accompanies a spear-man standing atop the dead body of a tyrant...
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety, as spoken by Benjamin Franklin in 1759 and again in 1775.
Live Free or Die: death is not the worst of evils, as toasted by Gen John Stark in 1809, later to become the NH State Motto...
To my readers - There is no greater threat to liberty than the formation of a World Government - especially one made up of kings, dictators, and other such tyrants. These propositions of such a uniform rule will only be done at the destruction of the US Constitution - the only document protecting what rights we have left from government domination.
This threat is real... as a man of principles, believing first and foremost in my natural rights and the natural rights of ALL MEN, it is my duty, my obligation to proclaim that any attempt at world governance and the destruction of individual liberty will be met with ultimate resistance.
I would rather die for a cause of true liberty than live one moment in bondage to absolute tyranny. As men and women of principle, you should make the same pledge to yourselves... fight for liberty, or die trying...
This has been both a blessing and a curse...
A blessing, because I have had an opportunity to step back and watch the events of the world unravel from a 30,000 foot level - giving me a different perspective for a short time while out of the trenches. It allowed me the opportunity to attempt to piece together our situation and to reflect on what it all means.
Which leads me to the curse - mainly because of the horrors I saw while viewing the entire spectacle, and my inability to jump back into the trenches and drive action - which is in my nature to do.
Right now, things are happening at lightning speed - and by things, I mean the status quo is dying and with it liberty, autonomy, and general welfare of the people.
Some issues that were of noted interest while I was away include Obama and the UN searching for common ground on a "World Currency", removing the last vested definition of borders or culture making up a country. Along these lines, Obama is directly dissolving the United States in favor of a One World Government - free from accountability - absolute tyranny.
Along these same lines, the government is increasing their choke-hold over companies - directing laws at individuals, mandating business decisions of recently nationalized companies, and using the national economic crisis to change laws in order to accomplish "legal" power grabs.
The end game is simple - absolute power - absolute tyranny - Pax Unitis... a world United in "Peace"... complete capitulation by those with liberty in order to join those without, in the name of security, stabilization, and peace...
What it amounts to is little more than the final solution of the New World Order... think I am kidding, or just a conspiracy theorist?
World Bank president Robert Zoellick, during a speech on the eve of the G-20 London summit stated, “If leaders are serious about creating new global responsibilities or governance, let them start by modernising multilateralism to empower the WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank Group to monitor national policies.”
Sic Semper Tyrannis, thus always to tyrants, the motto of the state of Virginia, accompanies a spear-man standing atop the dead body of a tyrant...
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety, as spoken by Benjamin Franklin in 1759 and again in 1775.
Live Free or Die: death is not the worst of evils, as toasted by Gen John Stark in 1809, later to become the NH State Motto...
To my readers - There is no greater threat to liberty than the formation of a World Government - especially one made up of kings, dictators, and other such tyrants. These propositions of such a uniform rule will only be done at the destruction of the US Constitution - the only document protecting what rights we have left from government domination.
This threat is real... as a man of principles, believing first and foremost in my natural rights and the natural rights of ALL MEN, it is my duty, my obligation to proclaim that any attempt at world governance and the destruction of individual liberty will be met with ultimate resistance.
I would rather die for a cause of true liberty than live one moment in bondage to absolute tyranny. As men and women of principle, you should make the same pledge to yourselves... fight for liberty, or die trying...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)