Obama's Plan to Try Terror Suspects in Civil Courts Backfiring

Imagine the response if the hundreds of thousands of prisoners of war during WWII were shipped to the United States for trial in civilian courts. I suppose we live in a different time, and fight different battles. It appears that the latest battle by Obama, to try terror suspects in civilian courts, is one that we are determined to lose.

The court ruled today that the Government's star witness cannot testify, because his testimony to the CIA was given only after severe coercion while in custody. The government asked for a delay in the trial to reorganize its case.

What is most predictable in this case is that there is a possibility that the defendant can be found not guilty due to lack of constitutionally acquired evidence and released to walk out the front doors of the court house. This question was posed to Obama, about if he was ready and willing to accept such a ruling and allow known enemies of the state out of US custody and out into the streets? His response is that none of them would win their case - a statement I likened to a kangaroo court (knowing the outcome before the trial).

In any case, it seems that the government is in a tight spot, and we may be a week away from a mistrial, where the headlines will undoubtedly read "Obama's Miscalculation Frees Known Terrorist". That is right. I am sure that no blame will be placed on the divine one!

Federal Court to WA State - "Imprisoned Felons have a RIGHT to Vote"

Just when you think that the Federal Government has gone too far, the Judicial Branch jumps into the spotlight with a whopper of a violation of state's rights. From the Associated Press:

OLYMPIA, Wash. —
A federal appeals court has ruled that imprisoned felons should be allowed to vote in Washington to ensure that racial minorities are protected under the Voting Rights Act.

Tuesday's 2-1 ruling by a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the 2000 ruling of a district judge in Spokane. That judge had ruled that state law did not violate the act, and dismissed a lawsuit filed by a former prison inmate from Bellevue.

The two appellate judges ruled that disparities in the state's justice system "cannot be explained in race-neutral ways."

A spokeswoman says state Attorney General Rob McKenna is weighing the state's next step.

The protection of racial minorities is of more importance than the sanctity of elections, according to the 9th Circuit Clowns. Such a ruling is as intrusive into State's Rights as it is insane. An individual should not be barred from voting based on gender or skin tone, but there are multitudes of legal and justifiable reasons why free citizens would want to bar the most violent criminal minds from helping shape our society!

At this point, I need someone to remind me why we are not immediately instituting a policy of 'tar and feather' - and I am not referring to the felons!

As a devoted 10th amendment supporter, there is nothing that makes my skin crawl more than federal "leaders" meddling in state affairs - UNLESS it is the feds meddling in state ELECTIONS.

Cry 'HAVOC', and Let Slip the Dogs of War (part II)

The Islamification of The United Kingdom is complete!

On February 25th, 2008, I wrote an article pertaining to the destruction of British existence, when the Archbishop of Canterbury declared that Sharia Law should be used in place of British Common Law.

The Archbishop has gotten his wish. The Times of London reported today that Britain has adopted Sharia Law, giving the Muslim Sharia courts authority to rule on all civil cases pertaining to Muslim citizens. Britain is now a house divided. There is no one Law in Once-Great Britain. Our brethren - the home of our founding fathers, has fallen to Radical Islam.

The Times reports:

The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence.

Previously, the rulings of sharia courts in Britain could not be enforced, and depended on voluntary compliance among Muslims.

Britain has fallen into the dark ages, a footnote in the pages of history. The civilization that had given the world the Magna Carta now finds it's hands tied by religious extremism, not interested in coexisting in a civilized world, under that countries laws. The British have been colonized and their freedoms exploited to instill Islamic Laws that many muslims fled as they moved from their home country... now they find themselves first under the thumb of Sharia - then shortly under the Iron Fist of full religious exploitation of free-men.

If there be a single good Englishman left in Britain - Lend me your ear!

when the blast of war blows in our ears, Then imitate the action of the tiger

At what point do you, Good Brits, stand up and proclaim: "Enough is Enough"?

Dishonour not your mothers; now attest
That those whom you call'd fathers did beget you.
Be copy now to men of grosser blood,
And teach them how to war. And you, good yeoman,
Whose limbs were made in England, show us here
The mettle of your pasture; let us swear
That you are worth your breeding

Britain is now a country where a good Muslim man is expected to discipline his wife and children, forcing obedience to him and his religion. It is now a country where a woman has no rights over a man, and is now subordinate to men. Britain is now a country where women can be disciplined for their clothing, their make-up, and their thoughts.

Lest the people of Britain Cry HAVOC! and let slip the dogs of war... Petition your government on this fundamental flaw, and this ghastly opinion of the British Courts.

Stand up for freedom and dignity of a civilized nation.

Do not allow defeat without struggle. Arm, arm yourselves! Better not to die as slaves, rather to fight as free men and die only with harness!

If ever Britain needed guidance and strength, now is that time!

President Bush lets Cat out of the Bag about 2000?

Reports are starting to circulate that could put the entire political world on it's head.

A secretly recorded conversation between President George W. Bush and an as yet unidentified voice seems to imply that George Bush's campaign had knowledge of "a fix" in the 2000 elections.

Having listened to the audio on a Reuters feed, Bush's voice is very clear, and some of the claims he makes could possibly land him in the middle of an impeachment hearing.

Bush can clearly be heard whispering "I had no idea they were serious, but when the court ruling was announced I knew they really fixed it"

The release of this audio puts us into the midst of a constitutional crisis. George Bush (apparently) won in 2004 legitimately, so he is the President... but if he had knowledge of a rigged election, then he was not the legitimate leader of the US for the first term.

I am in shock right now trying to imagine what implications this could have, now in 2008.

I need to hear from someone who knows something about Constitutional Law on this one!

All I can say is WOW!